The potential perpetrators, including Hanno Berger, argue that the scheme was merely a tax loophole and that they had therefore acted within the law. The BGH takes a different view: in July 2021, the court ruled in a landmark judgment that the actions of two British share traders were intentional, with the aim of obtaining refunds from the tax authorities. The cum-ex fraud therefore constitutes criminal tax evasion.
If convicted, Hanno Berger faces a long prison sentence.